Tags: Environmental Action Taken
Dynegy Decision to Pull Plug on Five Planned Coal-Fired Power Plants Heralded as Important Anti-Coal Victory (U.S.A.)
Step Seen as “Outstanding Clean Energy Start to New Year,” Marks Further Decline of Dirty Power
The Dynegy, an American power company, decision by to pull out of planned power plant projects means that “coal-fired power is one big step closer to being mothballed once and for all,” according to Green America, formerly “Co-op America.”
On Friday, Dynegy canceled its joint development agreement with LS Power to build a new fleet of coal plants. Although LS Power retains the right to develop the projects on their own, Dynegy is far larger than LS Power, and without Dynegy’s support LS Power will have a much harder time raising funds and securing long-term purchase agreements which enable new power plants to move forward. Green America was a leader in putting pressure on Dynegy to pull the plug on its coal-fired power plant expansion plans.
In May 2008, Green America climate action campaign coordinator Yochi Zakai warned investors attending Dynegy’s annual shareholder meeting about the massive cost of carbon regulation to the company and also raised concerns about the toll of its coal plants on surrounding communities and its impact on climate change. Heeding that message, Dynegy’s stock rose 38 cents on Friday as investors acknowledged the risk that new coal plants represented.
Zakai said, “Dynegy — the company that was being called ‘the next King Coal’ for its extensive new power plant plans — has all but given up pursuit of that throne. 2009 promises to be a landmark growth year for clean energy and with this development coal-fired power is one step closer to being mothballed once and for all in the U.S.”
Under the terms of Friday’s announcement, Dynegy cut its ties to coal-fired power plant plans in Arkansas, Georgia, Iowa, Michigan and Nevada. LS Power may continue development on the
Arkansas coal plant, and Dynegy currently plans to move ahead with plans to build a new plant in Texas. Green America and other groups vow to continue fighting these new coal plants.
The environmental community had labeled Dynegy “the next King Coal” in response to their plans to build the coal plants, the largest new coal fleet proposed in the USA. Last spring thousands of Green America members spoke up to urge Dynegy to cancel the plants. Working with individual and institutional investors, Green America raised concerns about Dynegy’s climate risk consistently over the past year.
“America doesn’t need dirty, expensive coal-fired power plants. A focus on energy efficiency and renewable energy will be far more cost-effective for meeting power needs going forward,” said Todd Larsen, Green America’s director of Corporate Responsibility. “Investing in efficiency and clean energy will jump start our economy, America’s quest for energy independence and the victory over the climate crisis.”
About Green America
Green America is a not-for-profit membership organization founded in 1982 and known until 01 January 2009 as “Co-op America.” Green America’s mission is to harness economic power — the strength of consumers, investors, businesses, and the marketplace — to create a socially just and environmentally sustainable society.
For more information, please visit their website: http://www.greenamericatoday.org
Source: Green America, Washington, DC
Website: http://www.greenamericatoday.org/
Related posts:
- Proposed Dirty Coal-fired Power Plants Halted by People Power Co-op America’s Climate Change Program today applauded a decision by...
- First near-Zero Emissions, Coal-Fired Power Plant to be Designed and Built by Washington Group International A first-of-its-kind, coal-fired, near-zero emissions electric power plant is planned...
- New Energy in America for 2008 Trumps Coal (U.S.A.) This year’s plans for 24 new coal-fired power plants were...
- The Beginning of the End for Dirty Power Plants The accession of ten new member states to the EU...
- Coalition to Unmask the Clean Coal Myth Challenges Coal Industry to Live up to the Promise of...
Jan 6th 2009
It’s certainly interesting to see that some of these companies are coming to their senses.
Jan 6th 2009
Yes, it is good to see and, presume it was done solely because they are environmentally concerned. However, there are firms that do things and publicize them for the purpose of obtaining public approval and at the same time do other things that are not good for the environment, but they don’t publicize these things. I do not know whether Dynegy falls into the former or latter.
I am encouraged to see this action on their part - regardless of motivation, it is better than building the coal-fired power plants.
With our vast supply of coal, I posted on my blog, in the past, and ECO Dirt the suggestion that the government and/or some organization offer an award for development of a process for eliminating co2 with an industrial viable method to foster innovation.